linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq15y88dux4.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 17:59:29 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>
Cc:     James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy


Azeem,

> strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. This read may exceed
> the destination size limit. This is both inefficient and can lead to
> linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1]. In
> an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace strlcpy() here
> with strscpy(). No return values were used, so direct replacement is
> safe.

Applied to 6.5/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering