[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230615044015.GA4720@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 06:40:15 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Joe Breuer <linux-kernel@...reuer.net>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
Linux Power Management <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Hardening <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...i.sm>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Waking up from resume locks up on sr device
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 09:10:28AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > Here's what commit e27829dc92e5 ("scsi: serialize ->rescan against
> > ->remove", written by Christoph Hellwig) says:
> >
> > Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
> > concurrent calls to ->remove.
> >
> > That's the commit which added the device_lock() call.
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> +Christoph
>
> Why is adding the device_lock() needed ? We could just do a
> scsi_device_get()+scsi_device_put() to serialize against remove. No ?
No. scsi_device_get just increments a reference count, and thus
prevents ->release from beeing called. ->remove is not in any way
affected by the refcount.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists