linux-hardening - Re: UBSAN spat in valid xhci code in Linus's current tree (6.4+)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202306291147.4CE126CE5@keescook>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 11:58:43 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UBSAN spat in valid xhci code in Linus's current tree (6.4+)

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> Boris just reported to me a UBSAN splat in the USB xhci driver in
> Linus's tree that wasn't present in 6.4-final, and given that no USB
> changes are merged yet there, I was confused.
> 
> Turns out, I think you all missed a "variable length" structure in the
> xhci driver, which UBSAN is calling out a being an overrun, when really
> it isn't (it's just written that way...)
> 
> The splat is:
> 
> UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c:231:31
> index 1 is out of range for type '__le32 [1]'
> CPU: 0 PID: 1556 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 6.4.0+ #7

This is fixed here, a couple weeks ago, but maybe it missed your tree:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230614181307.gonna.256-kees@kernel.org/

Would you prefer I carry it?

> So perhaps 2d47c6956ab3 ("ubsan: Tighten UBSAN_BOUNDS on GCC") should be
> reverted for now?  Or this field fixed up to properly be marked as a
> variable length array of at least one entry?

We've been turning these things on further and further so we can catch
stuff like this (and we did while it lived in -next). FWIW, it shouldn't
cause any problems beyond the splat (i.e. everything should continue
working normally).

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook