[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023081141-unruffled-fondness-aa62@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 16:18:56 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: stable-rc: 6.1: gcc-plugins: Reorganize gimple includes for GCC
13
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 08:27:20AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 08:47:53AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 02:01, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:57:30AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > > LKFT build plans updated with toolchain gcc-13 and here is the report.
> > > >
> > > > Stable rc 6.1 arm64 builds with gcc-13 failed and the bisection is pointing
> > > > to this as first bad commit,
> > > >
> > > > # first fixed commit: [e6a71160cc145e18ab45195abf89884112e02dfb]
> > > > gcc-plugins: Reorganize gimple includes for GCC 13
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Anders for bisecting this problem against Linux 6.2-rc6.
> > > >
> > > > Build errors:
> > > > ---------------
> > > > In file included from /builds/linux/scripts/gcc-plugins/gcc-common.h:75,
> > > > from /builds/linux/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c:30:
> > > > /usr/lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/13/plugin/include/gimple-fold.h:72:32:
> > > > error: use of enum 'gsi_iterator_update' without previous declaration
> > > > 72 | enum gsi_iterator_update,
> > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > I'm slightly confused by this report.
> >
> > Sorry. I should have provided full details.
> >
> > > Is it the build of v6.1 that is failing?
> >
> > Linux-stable-rc linux.6.1.y failing with gcc-13.
>
> I don't understand, I test here with gcc-13 for 6.4.y and 6.1.y and it's
> working just fine. What changed to cause this to fail now?
>
> I'm using:
> gcc (GCC) 13.2.1 20230801
Anyway, it's easy enough for me to apply it, so now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists