[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQNS0qzJVrRRgNLO@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:37:07 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] lib/string_helpers: Don't copy a tail in
kstrdup_and_replace() if 'new' is \0
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 12:45:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The kstrdup_and_replace() takes two characters, old and new, to replace
> former with latter after the copying of the original string. But in case
> when new is a NUL, there is no point to copy the rest of the string,
> the contract with the callers is that that the function returns a
> NUL-terminated string and not a buffer of the size filled with a given
> data. With this we can optimize the memory consumption by copying only
> meaningful part of the original string and drop the rest.
Thinking about this more, I self NAK this.
If the caller knows the size of the original message it can be handy to make
a copy and replace all occurrences of old by NUL. This will be an optimized
implementation of strsep(str, "$OLD").
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists