[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230915105933.495735-2-matteorizzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:59:20 +0000
From: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@...gle.com>
To: cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org
Cc: jannh@...gle.com, matteorizzo@...gle.com, evn@...gle.com,
poprdi@...gle.com, jordyzomer@...gle.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/14] mm/slub: don't try to dereference invalid freepointers
slab_free_freelist_hook tries to read a freelist pointer from the
current object even when freeing a single object. This is invalid
because single objects don't actually contain a freelist pointer when
they're freed and the memory contains other data. This causes problems
for checking the integrity of freelist in get_freepointer.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@...gle.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index f7940048138c..a7dae207c2d2 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1820,7 +1820,9 @@ static inline bool slab_free_freelist_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
do {
object = next;
- next = get_freepointer(s, object);
+ /* Single objects don't actually contain a freepointer */
+ if (object != old_tail)
+ next = get_freepointer(s, object);
/* If object's reuse doesn't have to be delayed */
if (!slab_free_hook(s, object, slab_want_init_on_free(s))) {
--
2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists