[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+fCnZeyS=wr-u4FgJmGLXujcat=oQ+jo-NAt1TtSa_tLEstSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 18:18:54 +0200
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Introduce CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 4:40 PM Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > Can't we unpoision this rcu_head right before call_rcu() and repoison
> > after receiving the callback?
>
> Yeah, I think that should work. It looks like currently
> kasan_unpoison() is exposed in include/linux/kasan.h but
> kasan_poison() is not, and its inline definition probably means I
> can't just move it out of mm/kasan/kasan.h into include/linux/kasan.h;
> do you have a preference for how I should handle this? Hmm, and it
> also looks like code outside of mm/kasan/ anyway wouldn't know what
> are valid values for the "value" argument to kasan_poison().
> I also have another feature idea that would also benefit from having
> something like kasan_poison() available in include/linux/kasan.h, so I
> would prefer that over adding another special-case function inside
> KASAN for poisoning this piece of slab metadata...
This is a problem only for the Generic mode, right? You already call
kasan_reset_tag on the rcu_head, which should suppress the reporting
for the tag-based modes.
If so, would it be possible to reuse metadata_access_enable/disable?
They are used for accessing slub_debug metadata and seem to fit nicely
with this case as well.
I also second Macro's comment to add a test for the new functionality.
Thanks for working on this!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists