linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] aoe: refactor deprecated strncpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e6433ada-16db-4d16-801b-9a3fd5460467@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:00:45 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Justin Sanders <justin@...aid.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>,
        Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aoe: refactor deprecated strncpy

On 9/18/23 1:03 AM, Justin Stitt wrote:
>> Change looks fine to me too, but for the love of $deity, please use
>> a proper subject line for these kinds of patches. It's not refactoring
>> anything.
>>
> 
> Fair.
> 
> Perhaps "xyz: replace strncpy with strscpy"?

That's a lot more descriptive, as a) it's actually accurate, and b) this
is what the patch does. You just sent another one with this refactor
wording which makes zero sense, please resend this and others targeted
at block with a proper description.

-- 
Jens Axboe