[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230926092427.GC12504@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:24:27 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] USB: gadget/legacy: remove sb_mutex
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 12:10:56PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 08:10:04AM -0300, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Creating new a new super_block vs freeing the old one for single instance
> > file systems is serialized by the wait for SB_DEAD.
> >
> > Remove the superfluous sb_mutex.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > ---
>
> You might mention that this is essentially a reversion of commit
> d18dcfe9860e ("USB: gadgetfs: Fix race between mounting and
> unmounting").
The difference we have now is that sb creation waits for the
old one to go way, but I'll add a notice on all that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists