linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH][next] usb: atm: Use size_add() in call to struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:15:01 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@...e.fr>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] usb: atm: Use size_add() in call to struct_size()

On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:20:14 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> If, for any reason, the open-coded arithmetic causes a wraparound,
> the protection that `struct_size()` adds against potential integer
> overflows is defeated. Fix this by hardening call to `struct_size()`
> with `size_add()`.
> 
> 

Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!

[1/1] usb: atm: Use size_add() in call to struct_size()
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/13f1a60fe04f

Take care,

-- 
Kees Cook