lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CADnq5_Ma2CrLYggJHKFEObsNmUoqJwb2p1xai5DfL=m43U6zEA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:06:19 -0400 From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> To: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>, Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@....com>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>, Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>, Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@....com>, VMware Graphics Reviewers <linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@....com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@....com>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Le Ma <le.ma@....com>, Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>, Lang Yu <Lang.Yu@....com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@...el.com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@....com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>, John Harrison <john.c.harrison@...el.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>, Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@...el.com>, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20 AM Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com> wrote: > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > >> array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > >> bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array > >> indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). > >> > >> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by to structs that would > >> benefit from the annotation. > >> > >> [...] > > Since this got Acks, I figure I should carry it in my tree. Let me know > > if this should go via drm instead. > > > > Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks! > > > > [1/9] drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/a6046ac659d6 > > STOP! In a follow up discussion Alex and I figured out that this won't work. > > The value in the structure is byte swapped based on some firmware > endianness which not necessary matches the CPU endianness. SMU10 is APU only so the endianess of the SMU firmware and the CPU will always match. Alex > > Please revert that one from going upstream if it's already on it's way. > > And because of those reasons I strongly think that patches like this > should go through the DRM tree :) > > Regards, > Christian. > > > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 > > [5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct nvkm_perfdom with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/188aeb08bfaa > > [6/9] drm/vc4: Annotate struct vc4_perfmon with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/59a54dc896c3 > > [7/9] drm/virtio: Annotate struct virtio_gpu_object_array with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/5cd476de33af > > [8/9] drm/vmwgfx: Annotate struct vmw_surface_dirty with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/b426f2e5356a > > [9/9] drm/v3d: Annotate struct v3d_perfmon with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/dc662fa1b0e4 > > > > Take care, > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists