lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231020044645.GC11984@lst.de> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 06:46:45 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev Subject: Re: the nul-terminated string helper desk chair rearrangement On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:01:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > Almost all of the remaining strncpy() usage is just string to string > copying, but the corner cases that are being spun out that aren't > strscpy() or strscpy_pad() are covered by strtomem(), kmemdup_nul(), > and memcpy(). Each of these are a clear improvement since they remove > the ambiguity of the intended behavior. Using seq_buf ends up being way > more overhead than is needed. I'm really not sure strscpy is much of an improvement. In this particular case in most other places we simply use a snprintf for nqns, which seems useful here to if we don't want the full buf. But switching to a completely undocumented helper like strscpy seems not useful at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists