lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231024152708.GFZTfiTL9C6onZKn99@fat_crate.local> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:27:08 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> Cc: Jeshua Smith <jeshuas@...dia.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>, "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>, "gpiccoli@...lia.com" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ACPI: APEI: Use ERST timeout for slow devices On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:32:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > So there are 3 designated reviewers for APEI: Tony Luck, Borislav > Petkov and James Morse. I need an ACK or Reviewed-by from one of > them, so I can proceed with an APEI patch. Here's what I see: cat /tmp/patch | ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> (supporter:PSTORE FILESYSTEM) Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> (reviewer:PSTORE FILESYSTEM) "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com> (reviewer:PSTORE FILESYSTEM) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> (unknown:ACPI APEI) Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> (reviewer:ACPI APEI) James Morse <james.morse@....com> (reviewer:ACPI APEI) Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> (reviewer:ACPI APEI) so I'm guessing Kees, Tony, Guilherme ... >From what I can see, the change itself is making me ask more questions: When I see "may" in commit messages "Slow devices such as flash may not meet the default 1ms timeout value" then I wanna know what devices are those? What is the actual use case here? Upthread there's a question about the ACPI spec. That should be explained too. Because I have no clue what "the ERST max execution time value" is. And so on. HTH. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists