[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169818232966.2100071.9153679108451026314.b4-ty@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:18:55 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: Annotate struct reset_control_array with __counted_by
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:52:29 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
>
> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct reset_control_array.
> Additionally, since the element count member must be set before accessing
> the annotated flexible array member, move its initialization earlier.
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!
[1/1] reset: Annotate struct reset_control_array with __counted_by
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/fed2ef7abaeb
Take care,
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists