[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8093ceb3-0857-4c36-8856-72a158e47b6c@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:21:19 +0800
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com, gpiccoli@...lia.com,
rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org, robert.moore@...el.com,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] Use ERST for persistent storage of MCE and
APEI errors
On 2023/10/7 15:15, Shuai Xue wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/9/28 22:43, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:44:17PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
>>> After /dev/mcelog character device deprecated by commit 5de97c9f6d85
>>> ("x86/mce: Factor out and deprecate the /dev/mcelog driver"), the
>>> serialized MCE error record, of previous boot in persistent storage is not
>>> collected via APEI ERST.
>>
>> You lost me here. /dev/mcelog is deprecated but you can still use it and
>> apei_write_mce() still happens.
>
> Yes, you are right. apei_write_mce() still happens so that MCE records are
> written to persistent storage and the MCE records can be retrieved by
> apei_read_mce(). Previously, the task was performed by the mcelog package.
> However, it has been deprecated, some distributions like Arch kernels are
> not even compiled with the necessary configuration option
> CONFIG_X86_MCELOG_LEGACY.[1]
>
> So, IMHO, it's better to add a way to retrieve MCE records through switching
> to the new generation rasdaemon solution.
>
>>
>> Looking at your patches, you're adding this to ghes so how about you sit
>> down first and explain your exact use case and what exactly you wanna
>> do?
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>
> Sorry for the poor cover letter. I hope the following response can clarify
> the matter.
>
> Q1: What is the exact problem?
>
> Traditionally, fatal hardware errors will cause Linux print error log to
> console, e.g. print_mce() or __ghes_print_estatus(), then reboot. With
> Linux, the primary method for obtaining debugging information of a serious
> error or fault is via the kdump mechanism. Kdump captures a wealth of
> kernel and machine state and writes it to a file for post-mortem debugging.
>
> In certain scenarios, ie. hosts/guests with root filesystems on NFS/iSCSI
> where networking software and/or hardware fails, and thus kdump fails to
> collect the hardware error context, leaving us unaware of what actually
> occurred. In the public cloud scenario, multiple virtual machines run on a
> single physical server, and if that server experiences a failure, it can
> potentially impact multiple tenants. It is crucial for us to thoroughly
> analyze the root causes of each instance failure in order to:
>
> - Provide customers with a detailed explanation of the outage to reassure them.
> - Collect the characteristics of the failures, such as ECC syndrome, to enable fault prediction.
> - Explore potential solutions to prevent widespread outages.
>
> In short, it is necessary to serialize hardware error information available
> for post-mortem debugging.
>
> Q2: What exactly I wanna do:
>
> The MCE handler, do_machine_check(), saves the MCE record to persistent
> storage and it is retrieved by mcelog. Mcelog has been deprecated when
> kernel 4.12 released in 2017, and the help of the configuration option
> CONFIG_X86_MCELOG_LEGACY suggest to consider switching to the new
> generation rasdaemon solution. The GHES handler does not support APEI error
> record now.
>
> To serialize hardware error information available for post-mortem
> debugging:
> - add support to save APEI error record into flash via ERST before go panic,
> - add support to retrieve MCE or APEI error record from the flash and emit
> the related tracepoint after system boot successful again so that rasdaemon
> can collect them
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Shuai
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Machine-check_exception
Hi, Borislav,
I would like to inquire about your satisfaction with the motivation
provided. If you have no objections, I am prepared to address Kees's
comments, update the cover letter, and proceed with sending a new version.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Shuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists