linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: Add a macro to wrap a deferred action function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKMK7uG-FH6iLpNpQ74xXPZoyGoDGvg+L99oCK3nFZT43o6GcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:00:35 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, dlatypov@...gle.com, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>, Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@...el.com>, 
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>, 
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, 
	Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, 
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: Add a macro to wrap a deferred action function

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 16:51, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 04:08:26 +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > KUnit's deferred action API accepts a void(*)(void *) function pointer
> > which is called when the test is exited. However, we very frequently
> > want to use existing functions which accept a single pointer, but which
> > may not be of type void*. While this is probably dodgy enough to be on
> > the wrong side of the C standard, it's been often used for similar
> >
> > [ ... ]
>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> for merging through kunit
tree, since I guess that's the simplest way to land this.

Cheers!
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch