linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sh: Added kernel.h to word-at-a-time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=XqPmkqkK9MsCDEhMWdXDQgeatL-+UDfnkNRDSycyyKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:51:42 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: tanzirh@...gle.com, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick DeSaulniers <nnn@...gle.com>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, 
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sh: Added kernel.h to word-at-a-time

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 1:37 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Also, please double-check your email configs: your full name is missing
> from your emails (it's just "tanzirh@...gle.com"):
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231214-libstringheader-v2-1-0f195dcff204@google.com/

This is the issue related to use of our internal mailer with b4.
Konstantin fixed this in b4 a while ago, but I suspect the version of
b4 we're getting from apt still does not contain the fix.

Or perhaps we need to switch to pyenv and pypi to install a newer
version of b4.  Tanzir (sits right next to me) and reports his version
of b4 is:

0.12.3

On pypi, looks like there's a 0.12.4
https://pypi.org/project/b4/#history
Looking at those release dates, I'm pretty sure Konstantine fixed this
particular issue in the 0.12.4 release.

(I made this mistake too recently, with my latest commit you picked up)

Debian stable says it has 0.12.0 https://packages.debian.org/stable/b4
Debian unstable says it has 0.12.4 https://packages.debian.org/unstable/b4
IDK where 0.12.3 is coming from. Perhaps our internal mirrors are
lagging behind.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers