linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kernel.h: removed REPEAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE-cH4p-TzH3zyJfmSg3r=fw78j8y-0t0dp-NvaLyVYAMULw1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:35:55 -0800
From: Tanzir Hasan <tanzirh@...gle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Nick DeSaulniers <nnn@...gle.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kernel.h: removed REPEAT_BYTE from kernel.h

> Legal note, this file is NOT copyright Google as no Google employe
> actually wrote the logcal contents of it.
>
> Please be VERY careful when doing stuff like this, it has potentially
> big repercussions, and you don't want to have to talk to lots of
> lawyers a few years from now and explain how you messed it all up :(

Ah, sorry, I didn't realize. Will change right away.

> Nick, odds are there's a Google copyright class that Tanzir should take
> here, if not, I recommend the free LF one that anyone can take online
> that explains the issues here:
>         https://training.linuxfoundation.org/training/open-source-licensing-basics-for-software-developers/

I will take a look, thanks!

> As-is, this change is STRONGLY Nacked by me.
>

Best,
Tanzir Hasan