linux-hardening - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] mseal: add mseal syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiy0nHG9+3rXzQa=W8gM8F6-MhsHrs_ZqWaHtjmPK4=FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 10:41:50 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: jeffxu@...omium.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com, 
	sroettger@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, 
	usama.anjum@...labora.com, jeffxu@...gle.com, jorgelo@...omium.org, 
	groeck@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, pedro.falcato@...il.com, 
	dave.hansen@...el.com, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, deraadt@...nbsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] mseal: add mseal syscall

One comment:

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 10:51, <jeffxu@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> index 9a846439b36a..02280199069b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(migrate_pages);
>  COND_SYSCALL(move_pages);
>  COND_SYSCALL(set_mempolicy_home_node);
>  COND_SYSCALL(cachestat);
> +COND_SYSCALL(mseal);
>
>  COND_SYSCALL(perf_event_open);
>  COND_SYSCALL(accept4);

Move this part to PATCH 1/1, so that it all builds cleanly.

Other than that, this seems all reasonable to me now.

                  Linus