[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240110215554.work.460-kees@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:56:01 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Haibo Li <haibo.li@...iatek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: unwind: Add missing "Call trace:" line
Every other architecture in Linux includes the line "Call trace:" before
backtraces. In some cases ARM would print "Backtrace:", but this was
only via 1 specific call path, and wasn't included in CPU Oops nor things
like KASAN, UBSAN, etc that called dump_stack(). Regularize this line
so CI systems and other things (like LKDTM) that depend on parsing
"Call trace:" out of dmesg will see it for ARM.
Before this patch:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:376:16
index 8 is out of range for type 'char [8]'
CPU: 0 PID: 1402 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2 #1
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
dump_backtrace from show_stack+0x20/0x24
r7:00000042 r6:00000000 r5:60070013 r4:80cf5d7c
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0x98
dump_stack_lvl from dump_stack+0x18/0x1c
r7:00000042 r6:00000008 r5:00000008 r4:80fab118
dump_stack from ubsan_epilogue+0x10/0x3c
ubsan_epilogue from __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x80/0x84
...
After this patch:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:376:16
index 8 is out of range for type 'char [8]'
CPU: 0 PID: 1402 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2 #1
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
dump_backtrace from show_stack+0x20/0x24
r7:00000042 r6:00000000 r5:60070013 r4:80cf5d7c
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0x98
dump_stack_lvl from dump_stack+0x18/0x1c
r7:00000042 r6:00000008 r5:00000008 r4:80fab118
dump_stack from ubsan_epilogue+0x10/0x3c
ubsan_epilogue from __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x80/0x84
...
Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>
Cc: Haibo Li <haibo.li@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 3bad79db5d6e..72c82a4d63ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned int fp, mode;
int ok = 1;
- printk("%sBacktrace: ", loglvl);
+ printk("%sCall trace: ", loglvl);
if (!tsk)
tsk = current;
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 9d2192156087..f60547dadc93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -524,6 +524,8 @@ void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
{
struct stackframe frame;
+ printk("%sCall trace: ", loglvl);
+
pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
if (!tsk)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists