linux-hardening - [PATCH] riscv: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240120135400.4710-1-erick.archer@gmx.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 14:54:00 +0100
From: Erick Archer <erick.archer@....com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
	Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
	Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
	Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Erick Archer <erick.archer@....com>,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()

As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.

So, use the purpose specific kcalloc() function instead of the argument
count * size in the kzalloc() function.

Also, it is preferred to use sizeof(*pointer) instead of sizeof(type)
due to the type of the variable can change and one needs not change the
former (unlike the latter).

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@....com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 89920f84d0a3..549a76e34c4e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -901,8 +901,7 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
 	unsigned int cpu_count = num_possible_cpus();
-	struct page **bufs = kzalloc(cpu_count * sizeof(struct page *),
-				     GFP_KERNEL);
+	struct page **bufs = kcalloc(cpu_count, sizeof(*bufs), GFP_KERNEL);

 	if (!bufs) {
 		pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n");
--
2.25.1