linux-hardening - [PATCH 09/82] select: Avoid wrap-around instrumentation in do_sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:26:44 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/82] select: Avoid wrap-around instrumentation in do_sys_poll()

The mix of int, unsigned int, and unsigned long used by struct
poll_list::len, todo, len, and j meant that the signed overflow
sanitizer got worried it needed to instrument several places where
arithmetic happens between these variables. Since all of the variables
are always positive and bounded by unsigned int, use a single type in
all places. Additionally expand the zero-test into an explicit range
check before updating "todo".

This keeps sanitizer instrumentation[1] out of a UACCESS path:

vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_sys_poll+0x285: call to __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow() with UACCESS enabled

Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 fs/select.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index 0ee55af1a55c..11a3b1312abe 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(old_select, struct sel_arg_struct __user *, arg)
 
 struct poll_list {
 	struct poll_list *next;
-	int len;
+	unsigned int len;
 	struct pollfd entries[];
 };
 
@@ -975,14 +975,15 @@ static int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
 		struct timespec64 *end_time)
 {
 	struct poll_wqueues table;
-	int err = -EFAULT, fdcount, len;
+	int err = -EFAULT, fdcount;
 	/* Allocate small arguments on the stack to save memory and be
 	   faster - use long to make sure the buffer is aligned properly
 	   on 64 bit archs to avoid unaligned access */
 	long stack_pps[POLL_STACK_ALLOC/sizeof(long)];
 	struct poll_list *const head = (struct poll_list *)stack_pps;
  	struct poll_list *walk = head;
- 	unsigned long todo = nfds;
+	unsigned int todo = nfds;
+	unsigned int len;
 
 	if (nfds > rlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -998,9 +999,9 @@ static int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
 					sizeof(struct pollfd) * walk->len))
 			goto out_fds;
 
-		todo -= walk->len;
-		if (!todo)
+		if (walk->len >= todo)
 			break;
+		todo -= walk->len;
 
 		len = min(todo, POLLFD_PER_PAGE);
 		walk = walk->next = kmalloc(struct_size(walk, entries, len),
@@ -1020,7 +1021,7 @@ static int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
 
 	for (walk = head; walk; walk = walk->next) {
 		struct pollfd *fds = walk->entries;
-		int j;
+		unsigned int j;
 
 		for (j = walk->len; j; fds++, ufds++, j--)
 			unsafe_put_user(fds->revents, &ufds->revents, Efault);
-- 
2.34.1