linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 11/82] arm64: atomics: lse: Silence intentional wrapping addition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Za-Mr7YFhS9iXiPW@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:53:51 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/82] arm64: atomics: lse: Silence intentional wrapping
 addition

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:26:46PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Annotate atomic_add_return() and atomic_sub_return() to avoid signed
> overflow instrumentation. They are expected to wrap around.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> index 87f568a94e55..30572458d702 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> @@ -79,13 +79,13 @@ ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_SUB(        )
>  #undef ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_SUB
>  
>  #define ATOMIC_OP_ADD_SUB_RETURN(name)					\
> -static __always_inline int						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap int				\
>  __lse_atomic_add_return##name(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic_fetch_add##name(i, v) + i;			\
>  }									\

I'd strongly prefer using add_wrap() rather than annotating the function, i.e.
make this:

  static __always_inline int						\
  __lse_atomic_add_return##name(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
  {									\
  	return add_wrap(__lse_atomic_fetch_add##name(i, v), i);		\
  }									\

Likewise for the other instances below.

With that, this looks fine to me.

Mark.

>  									\
> -static __always_inline int						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap int				\
>  __lse_atomic_sub_return##name(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic_fetch_sub(i, v) - i;			\
> @@ -186,13 +186,13 @@ ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_SUB(        )
>  #undef ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_SUB
>  
>  #define ATOMIC64_OP_ADD_SUB_RETURN(name)				\
> -static __always_inline long						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap long				\
>  __lse_atomic64_add_return##name(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic64_fetch_add##name(i, v) + i;		\
>  }									\
>  									\
> -static __always_inline long						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap long				\
>  __lse_atomic64_sub_return##name(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic64_fetch_sub##name(i, v) - i;		\
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>