linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 41/82] wil6210: Refactor intentional wrap-around test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <170601063238.3962299.12030024839048269322.kvalo@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>, Max Chen <mxchen@...eaurora.org>,
 Yang Shen <shenyang39@...wei.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
 Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 41/82] wil6210: Refactor intentional wrap-around test

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
> unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
> kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:
> 
> 	VAR + value < VAR
> 
> Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
> types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow
> option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we
> want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully
> instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they
> are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3],
> or pointer[4] types.
> 
> Refactor open-coded wrap-around addition test to use add_would_overflow().
> This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future.
> 
> Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4]
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> Cc: Max Chen <mxchen@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Yang Shen <shenyang39@...wei.com>
> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>

If you can edit before commit please add "wifi:" prefix to the wireless patches:

ERROR: 'wifi:' prefix missing: '[PATCH 41/82] wil6210: Refactor intentional wrap-around test'
ERROR: 'wifi:' prefix missing: '[PATCH 62/82] mwifiex: pcie: Refactor intentional wrap-around test'

2 patches set to Not Applicable.

13526631 [41/82] wil6210: Refactor intentional wrap-around test
13526632 [62/82] mwifiex: pcie: Refactor intentional wrap-around test

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240123002814.1396804-41-keescook@chromium.org/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches