linux-hardening - [PATCH 49/82] drm/i915: Refactor intentional wrap-around test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240123002814.1396804-49-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:27:24 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 49/82] drm/i915: Refactor intentional wrap-around test

In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:

	VAR + value < VAR

Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow
option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we
want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully
instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they
are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3],
or pointer[4] types.

Refactor open-coded wrap-around addition test to use add_would_overflow().
This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future.

Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4]
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
index d09aad34ba37..1a4f048a5df9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ int i915_vma_pin_ww(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 		goto err_remove;
 
 	/* There should only be at most 2 active bindings (user, global) */
-	GEM_BUG_ON(bound + I915_VMA_PAGES_ACTIVE < bound);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(add_would_overflow(bound, I915_VMA_PAGES_ACTIVE));
 	atomic_add(I915_VMA_PAGES_ACTIVE, &vma->pages_count);
 	list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->bound_list);
 
-- 
2.34.1