[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240226-strncpy-drivers-scsi-lpfc-lpfc_ct-c-v2-1-2df2e46569b9@google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:53:44 +0000
From: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>, Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy
strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
[1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
interfaces.
We expect ae->value_string to be NUL-terminated because there's a
comment that says as much; these attr strings are also used with other
string APIs, further cementing the fact.
Now, the question of whether or not to NUL-pad the destination buffer:
lpfc_fdmi_rprt_defer() initializes vports (all zero-initialized), then
we call lpfc_fdmi_cmd() with each vport and a mask. Then, inside of
lpfc_fdmi_cmd() we check each bit in the mask to invoke the proper
callback. Importantly, the zero-initialized vport is passed in as the
"attr" parameter. Seeing this:
| struct lpfc_fdmi_attr_string *ae = attr;
... we can tell that ae->value_string is entirely zero-initialized. Due
to this, NUL-padding is _not_ required as it would be redundant.
Considering the above, a suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2].
Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- keep strnlen (thanks Kees)
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240222-strncpy-drivers-scsi-lpfc-lpfc_ct-c-v1-1-20c685bd1b43@google.com/
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
index baae1f8279e0..296d2d4796cb 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
@@ -2569,9 +2569,9 @@ lpfc_fdmi_set_attr_string(void *attr, uint16_t attrtype, char *attrstring)
* 64 bytes or less.
*/
- strncpy(ae->value_string, attrstring, sizeof(ae->value_string));
+ strscpy(ae->value_string, attrstring, sizeof(ae->value_string));
len = strnlen(ae->value_string, sizeof(ae->value_string));
- /* round string length to a 32bit boundary. Ensure there's a NULL */
+ /* round string length to a 32bit boundary */
len += (len & 3) ? (4 - (len & 3)) : 4;
/* size is Type/Len (4 bytes) plus string length */
size = FOURBYTES + len;
---
base-commit: 39133352cbed6626956d38ed72012f49b0421e7b
change-id: 20240222-strncpy-drivers-scsi-lpfc-lpfc_ct-c-f54b67eeeb68
Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists