linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] thermal: core: Move initial num

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2496f490-fbfb-403c-a86c-73960afb4e76@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:42:38 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, rui.zhang@...el.com,
 gustavoars@...nel.org, morbo@...gle.com, justinstitt@...gle.com,
 stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
 patches@...ts.linux.dev, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: core: Move initial num_trips assignment before
 memcpy()



On 2/28/24 17:48, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:56:51AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 08:41:07AM +0000, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>> Hi Nathan and Kees,
>>>
>>> On 2/27/24 17:00, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 05:47:44PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>> Ok my misunderstanding was I thought sizeof() was calling _bdos under the
>>>>> hood, so when calling sizeof(flex_array), it was returning the computed size
>>>>> inferring from the __counted_by field.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, sizeof() has a very limited scope. __builtin_object_size() has
>>>> more flexibility (via the 2nd argument, "type"), but it was still
>>>> compile-time only. __builtin_dynamic_object_size() was added to bring
>>>> runtime evaluations into the mix (initially to support the alloc_size
>>>> attribute, and now includes the counted_by attribute too).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your earlier emails explaining these stuff.
>>> Do you have maybe some presentation about those features
>>> for the kernel (ideally w/ a video from some conference)?
>>
>> I think Kees's 2022 and 2023 talks at LPC are a good place to start:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/tQwv79i02ks?si=Nj9hpvmQwPB4K3Y4&t=452
>> https://youtu.be/OEFFqhP5sts?si=u6RnOP641S8FkouD&t=614
>>
>> https://outflux.net/slides/2022/lpc/features.pdf
>> https://outflux.net/slides/2023/lpc/features.pdf
> 
> I've also got a write-up on the entire topic of array bounds, which ends
> with some discussion of "the future" (which is now) involving the use of
> the "counted_by" attribute:
> https://people.kernel.org/kees/bounded-flexible-arrays-in-c#coming-soon-annotate-bounds-of-flexible-arrays
> 

Thank you guys!