linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section on walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240319081640.GAZflJ6IBQ7TEKD2Ll@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:16:40 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@...edance.com>,
	jgross@...e.com, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	adobriyan@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section on
 walk_relocs

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:45:45PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The commit it refs to landed via -hardening,

Yap, saw that. It should've gone through tip too as it is clearly a tip
tree patch.

> responsibility of landing this fix too. But it's fine to go via -tip
> if you prefer?

Yes, please. Just send a Reviewed-by and it'll get picked up.

Btw, while looking at that second patch, why does it have *three* Fixes:
tags? I think it wants to fix only your

aaa8736370db ("x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section")

?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette