linux-hardening - [PATCH 2/2] wifi: ath9k: work around memset overflow warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240328135509.3755090-3-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:55:05 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
	Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
	Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>,
	Hancheng Yang <hyang@...ebox.fr>,
	Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: ath9k: work around memset overflow warning

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

gcc-9 and some other older versions produce a false-positive warning
for zeroing two fields

In file included from include/linux/string.h:369,
                 from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c:18:
In function 'fortify_memset_chk',
    inlined from 'ath9k_ps_wakeup' at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c:140:3:
include/linux/fortify-string.h:462:25: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
  462 |                         __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Using a struct_group seems to reliably avoid the warning and
not make the code much uglier. The combined memset() should even
save a couple of cpu cycles.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
This is from randconfig testing, see https://pastebin.com/yjKk5N81
for a reproducer
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h        | 6 ++++--
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h
index f02a308a9ffc..34654f710d8a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h
@@ -171,8 +171,10 @@ struct ath_common {
 	unsigned int clockrate;
 
 	spinlock_t cc_lock;
-	struct ath_cycle_counters cc_ani;
-	struct ath_cycle_counters cc_survey;
+	struct_group(cc,
+		struct ath_cycle_counters cc_ani;
+		struct ath_cycle_counters cc_survey;
+	);
 
 	struct ath_regulatory regulatory;
 	struct ath_regulatory reg_world_copy;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index a2943aaecb20..01173aac3045 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -135,8 +135,7 @@ void ath9k_ps_wakeup(struct ath_softc *sc)
 	if (power_mode != ATH9K_PM_AWAKE) {
 		spin_lock(&common->cc_lock);
 		ath_hw_cycle_counters_update(common);
-		memset(&common->cc_survey, 0, sizeof(common->cc_survey));
-		memset(&common->cc_ani, 0, sizeof(common->cc_ani));
+		memset(&common->cc, 0, sizeof(common->cc));
 		spin_unlock(&common->cc_lock);
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.2