linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] alloc_tag: Tighten file permissions on /proc/allocinfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64cngpnwyav4odustofs6hgsh7htpc5nu23tx4lb3vxaltmqf2@sxn63f2gg4gu>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:04:47 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, 
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alloc_tag: Tighten file permissions on /proc/allocinfo

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:51:56PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 04:45:51PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 01:08:50PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The /proc/allocinfo file exposes a tremendous about of information about
> > > kernel build details, memory allocations (obviously), and potentially
> > > even image layout (due to ordering). As this is intended to be consumed
> > > by system owners (like /proc/slabinfo), use the same file permissions as
> > > there: 0400.
> > 
> > Err...
> > 
> > The side effect of locking down more and more reporting interfaces is
> > that programs that consume those interfaces now have to run as root.
> 
> sudo cat /proc/allocinfo | analyse-that-fie

Even that is still an annoyance, but I'm thinking more about a future
daemon to collect this every n seconds - that really shouldn't need to
be root.

And the "lock everything down" approach really feels like paranoia gone
too far - what's next, /proc/cpuinfo? Do we really want to go the
Windows approach of UAC pop ups for everything? I'd rather be going the
opposite direction, of making it as easy as possible for users to see
what's going on with their machine.

Instead, why not a sysctl, like we already have for perf?

The concern about leaking image layout could be addressed by sorting the
output before returning to userspace.