linux-hardening - [PATCH] tty: rfcomm: prefer struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <AS8PR02MB723725E0069F7AE8F64E876E8B142@AS8PR02MB7237.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:29:34 +0200
From: Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
	"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tty: rfcomm: prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic

This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].

As the "dl" variable is a pointer to "struct rfcomm_dev_list_req" and
this structure ends in a flexible array:

struct rfcomm_dev_list_req {
	[...]
	struct   rfcomm_dev_info dev_info[];
};

the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
do the arithmetic instead of the calculation "size + count * size" in
the kzalloc() and copy_to_user() functions.

At the same time remove the "size" variable as it is no longer needed.
This way, the code is more readable and safer.

This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle, and audited and
modified manually.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2]
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>
---
Hi,

The Coccinelle script used to detect this code pattern is the following:

virtual report

@rule1@
type t1;
type t2;
identifier i0;
identifier i1;
identifier i2;
identifier ALLOC =~ "kmalloc|kzalloc|kmalloc_node|kzalloc_node|vmalloc|vzalloc|kvmalloc|kvzalloc";
position p1;
@@

i0 = sizeof(t1) + sizeof(t2) * i1;
...
i2 = ALLOC@p1(..., i0, ...);

@script:python depends on report@
p1 << rule1.p1;
@@

msg = "WARNING: verify allocation on line %s" % (p1[0].line)
coccilib.report.print_report(p1[0],msg)

Regards,
Erick
---
 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
index 69c75c041fe1..bdc64c8fb85b 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int rfcomm_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
 	struct rfcomm_dev *dev;
 	struct rfcomm_dev_list_req *dl;
 	struct rfcomm_dev_info *di;
-	int n = 0, size, err;
+	int n = 0, err;
 	u16 dev_num;
 
 	BT_DBG("");
@@ -515,9 +515,7 @@ static int rfcomm_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
 	if (!dev_num || dev_num > (PAGE_SIZE * 4) / sizeof(*di))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	size = sizeof(*dl) + dev_num * sizeof(*di);
-
-	dl = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	dl = kzalloc(struct_size(dl, dev_info, dev_num), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!dl)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -542,9 +540,7 @@ static int rfcomm_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
 	mutex_unlock(&rfcomm_dev_lock);
 
 	dl->dev_num = n;
-	size = sizeof(*dl) + n * sizeof(*di);
-
-	err = copy_to_user(arg, dl, size);
+	err = copy_to_user(arg, dl, struct_size(dl, dev_info, n));
 	kfree(dl);
 
 	return err ? -EFAULT : 0;
-- 
2.25.1