[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjJYV7ak5ApgNTBx@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 17:57:27 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>, wklin@...gle.com,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [POC][RFC][PATCH 1/2] mm/x86: Add wildcard * option as
memmap=nn*align:name
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:22:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:19:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:59:07 +0300
> > Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:11:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:23:07 -0700
> > > > > Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Do we need to involve e820 at all? I think it might be possible to just
> > > > > > have pstore call request_mem_region() very early? Or does KASLR make
> > > > > > that unstable?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, would that give the same physical memory each boot, and can we
> > > > > guarantee that KASLR will not map the kernel over the previous location?
> > > >
> > > > Hm, no, for physical memory it needs to get excluded very early, which
> > > > means e820.
> > >
> > > Whatever memory is reserved in arch/x86/kernel/e820.c, that happens after
> > > kaslr, so to begin with, a new memmap parameter should be also added to
> > > parse_memmap in arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c to ensure the same
> > > physical address will be available after KASLR.
> >
> > But doesn't KASLR only affect virtual memory not physical memory?
>
> KASLR for x86 (and other archs, like arm64) do both physical and virtual
> base randomization.
>
> > This just makes sure the physical memory it finds will not be used by the
> > system. Then ramoops does the mapping via vmap() I believe, to get a
> > virtual address to access the physical address.
>
> I was assuming, since you were in the e820 code, that it was
> manipulating that before KASLR chose a location. But if not, yeah, Mike
> is right -- you need to make sure this is getting done before
> decompress_kernel().
Right now kaslr can handle up to 4 memmap regions and parse_memmap() in
arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c should be updated for a new memmap type.
But I think it's better to add a new kernel parameter as I suggested in
another email and teach mem_avoid_memmap() in kaslr.c to deal with it, as
well as with crashkernel=size@...set, btw.
> --
> Kees Cook
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists