linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] fs: WARN when f_count resurrection is attempted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240506103848.GN40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 12:38:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: WARN when f_count resurrection is attempted

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:16:25PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> It should never happen that get_file() is called on a file with
> f_count equal to zero. If this happens, a use-after-free condition
> has happened[1], and we need to attempt a best-effort reporting of
> the situation to help find the root cause more easily. Additionally,
> this serves as a data corruption indicator that system owners using
> warn_limit or panic_on_warn would like to have detected.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7c41cf3c-2a71-4dbb-8f34-0337890906fc@gmail.com/ [1]
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 00fc429b0af0..fa9ea5390f33 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1038,7 +1038,8 @@ struct file_handle {
>  
>  static inline struct file *get_file(struct file *f)
>  {
> -	atomic_long_inc(&f->f_count);
> +	long prior = atomic_long_fetch_inc_relaxed(&f->f_count);
> +	WARN_ONCE(!prior, "struct file::f_count incremented from zero; use-after-free condition present!\n");

This reminds me, I should some day try and fix the horrible code-gen for
WARN() :/ WARN_ON_*() and friends turn into a single trap instruction,
but the WARN() and friends thing turns into a horrible piece of crap for
the printk().