[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202405202157.xE9dP8fI-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 22:13:21 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Add KUnit test for bprm_stack_limits()
Hi Kees,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on kees/for-next/execve]
[also build test ERROR on kees/for-next/pstore kees/for-next/kspp brauner-vfs/vfs.all linus/master v6.9 next-20240520]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kees-Cook/exec-Avoid-pathological-argc-envc-and-bprm-p-values/20240520-101851
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git for-next/execve
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240520021615.741800-1-keescook%40chromium.org
patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Add KUnit test for bprm_stack_limits()
config: i386-randconfig-004-20240520 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240520/202405202157.xE9dP8fI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240520/202405202157.xE9dP8fI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405202157.xE9dP8fI-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
ld: fs/exec.o: in function `exec_test_bprm_stack_limits':
>> fs/exec_test.c:98:(.text+0xdfc): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format'
>> ld: fs/exec_test.c:98:(.text+0xe0c): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion'
>> ld: fs/exec_test.c:99:(.text+0xe56): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format'
ld: fs/exec_test.c:99:(.text+0xe66): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion'
Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FB_IOMEM_HELPERS
Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && FB_CORE [=n]
Selected by [m]:
- DRM_XE_DISPLAY [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && DRM_XE [=m] && DRM_XE [=m]=m
vim +98 fs/exec_test.c
85
86 static void exec_test_bprm_stack_limits(struct kunit *test)
87 {
88 /* Double-check the constants. */
89 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, _STK_LIM, SZ_8M);
90 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ARG_MAX, 32 * SZ_4K);
91
92 for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bprm_stack_limits_results); i++) {
93 const struct bprm_stack_limits_result *result = &bprm_stack_limits_results[i];
94 struct linux_binprm bprm = result->bprm;
95 int rc;
96
97 rc = bprm_stack_limits(&bprm);
> 98 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, rc, result->expected_rc, "on loop %d", i);
> 99 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, bprm.argmin, result->expected_argmin, "on loop %d", i);
100 }
101 }
102
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists