[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240604065727.4deefc04@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:57:27 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Kees Cook
<keescook@...omium.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, "Guilherme G.
Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Guenter
Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>,
wklin@...gle.com, Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>, Joel
Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport
<rppt@...nel.org>, ardb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/memblock: Add "reserve_mem" to reserved named
memory at boot up
On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 22:52:37 -0700
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> On June 3, 2024 4:33:31 PM PDT, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> >In order to allow for requesting a memory region that can be used for
> >things like pstore on multiple machines where the memory layout is not the
> >same, add a new option to the kernel command line called "reserve_mem".
> >
> >The format is: reserve_mem=nn:align:name
> >
> >Where it will find nn amount of memory at the given alignment of align.
> >The name field is to allow another subsystem to retrieve where the memory
> >was found. For example:
> >
> > reserve_mem=12M:4096:oops ramoops.mem_name=oops
>
> How does this interact with KASLR? It has chosen its physical location
> before this parsing happens, so I'd expect this to fail once in a while,
> unless the size/alignment is lucky enough that KASLR never uses that
> portion of the physical memory...
>
From looking at the KASLR code, it looks to me that it picks from 100
different locations. I could be wrong, but if you have sufficient memory,
I'm thinking that it should not conflict. But if it does, yes, it will fail
to pick the same location.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists