linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pstore/ramoops: Add ramoops.mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240613103144.2a78f663@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:31:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami
 Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar
 <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
 <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin"
 <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Tony Luck
 <tony.luck@...el.com>, "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Ross
 Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>, wklin@...gle.com, Vineeth Remanan Pillai
 <vineeth@...byteword.org>, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
 Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>, Linus Torvalds
 <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pstore/ramoops: Add ramoops.mem_name= command
 line option

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:06:47 +0200
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:

> Fair enough. As long as it is documented that there is no guarantee
> that this will keep working over a kernel upgrade, then I have no
> objections.

Thanks,

I'll send out v6 and even stress that this may not work for all kernel
versions.

-- Steve