linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.10 02/16] fs: remove accidental overflow during wraparound check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240729115418.xzfmanyqtipkuttx@quack3>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:54:18 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, nathan@...nel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.10 02/16] fs: remove accidental overflow during
 wraparound check

On Sat 27-07-24 20:47:19, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 23cc6ef6fd453b13502caae23130844e7d6ed0fe ]

Sasha, this commit is only about silencing false-positive UBSAN warning.
Not sure if it is really a stable material...

								Honza

> 
> Running syzkaller with the newly enabled signed integer overflow
> sanitizer produces this report:
> 
> [  195.401651] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  195.404808] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../fs/open.c:321:15
> [  195.408739] 9223372036854775807 + 562984447377399 cannot be represented in type 'loff_t' (aka 'long long')
> [  195.414683] CPU: 1 PID: 703 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00039-g14de58dbe653-dirty #11
> [  195.420138] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> [  195.425804] Call Trace:
> [  195.427360]  <TASK>
> [  195.428791]  dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0
> [  195.431150]  handle_overflow+0x171/0x1b0
> [  195.433640]  vfs_fallocate+0x459/0x4f0
> ...
> [  195.490053] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  195.493146] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../fs/open.c:321:61
> [  195.497030] 9223372036854775807 + 562984447377399 cannot be represented in type 'loff_t' (aka 'long long)
> [  195.502940] CPU: 1 PID: 703 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00039-g14de58dbe653-dirty #11
> [  195.508395] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> [  195.514075] Call Trace:
> [  195.515636]  <TASK>
> [  195.517000]  dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0
> [  195.519255]  handle_overflow+0x171/0x1b0
> [  195.521677]  vfs_fallocate+0x4cb/0x4f0
> [  195.524033]  __x64_sys_fallocate+0xb2/0xf0
> 
> Historically, the signed integer overflow sanitizer did not work in the
> kernel due to its interaction with `-fwrapv` but this has since been
> changed [1] in the newest version of Clang. It was re-enabled in the
> kernel with Commit 557f8c582a9ba8ab ("ubsan: Reintroduce signed overflow
> sanitizer").
> 
> Let's use the check_add_overflow helper to first verify the addition
> stays within the bounds of its type (long long); then we can use that
> sum for the following check.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432 [1]
> Closes: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/356
> Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240513-b4-sio-vfs_fallocate-v2-1-db415872fb16@google.com
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/open.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> index 278b3edcda444..1dd123ba34ee9 100644
> --- a/fs/open.c
> +++ b/fs/open.c
> @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ int vfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>  	long ret;
> +	loff_t sum;
>  
>  	if (offset < 0 || len <= 0)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -319,8 +320,11 @@ int vfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
>  	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	/* Check for wrap through zero too */
> -	if (((offset + len) > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) || ((offset + len) < 0))
> +	/* Check for wraparound */
> +	if (check_add_overflow(offset, len, &sum))
> +		return -EFBIG;
> +
> +	if (sum > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)
>  		return -EFBIG;
>  
>  	if (!file->f_op->fallocate)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR