lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALmYWFv+cy4mL85e4fLCC6fbt4FxB1ONSnVaBcezN84bCbEr5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:22:18 -0700
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	pedro.falcato@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, jeffxu@...gle.com, 
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, oliver.sang@...el.com, 
	vbabka@...e.cz, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mremap refactor: check src address for vma
 boundaries first.

On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:50 AM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> * Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org> [240814 23:46]:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:55 PM Liam R. Howlett
> > <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > The majority of the comments to V2 are mine, you only told us that
> > > splitting a sealed vma is wrong (after I asked you directly to answer)
> > > and then you made a comment about testing of the patch set. Besides the
> > > direct responses to me, your comment was "wait for me to test".
> > >
> > Please share this link for  " Besides the direct responses to me, your
> > comment was "wait for me to test".
> > Or  pop up that email by responding to it, to remind me.  Thanks.
>
> [1].

That is responding to Andrew, to indicate V2 patch has dependency on
arch_munmap in PPC. And I will review/test the code, I will respond to
Andrew directly.

PS Your statement above is entirely false, and out of context.

" You only told us that splitting a sealed vma is wrong (after I asked
you directly to answer) and then you made a comment about testing of
the patch set. Besides the direct responses to me, your comment was
"wait for me to test".

If you will excuse me, I would rather spend time on code/test and
other duties than responding to your false accusation.

Best regards,
-Jeff

>
> Liam
>
> ...
>
> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALmYWFs0v07z5vheDt1h3hD+3--yr6Va0ZuQeaATo+-8MuRJ-g@mail.gmail.com/
> [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3rpmzsxiwo5t2uq7xy5inizbtaasotjtzocxbayw5ntgk5a2rx@jkccjg5mbqqh/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ