linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] Add str_true_false()/str_false

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024082311-unaltered-grumbly-5c94@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:38:39 +0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>, kees@...nel.org, andy@...nel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] Add str_true_false()/str_false_true() helper

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 04:22:32PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:13 AM Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add str_true_false()/str_false_true() helper to "true" or "false"
> > string literal. And we found more than 10 cases currently exist
> > in the tree. So these helpers can be used for these cases.
> 
> Squash them into a single patch. There is no need to split these.

And let's see some patches that change existing code to use them, we
can't add new functions that are never used in the tree.

thanks,

greg k-h