linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_true_false/str_false

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b9c1d9d-b9c1-4583-83dc-a331b56b85f9@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:42:18 +0800
From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: <kees@...nel.org>, <andy@...nel.org>, <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
	<nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, <cocci@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] coccinelle: Add rules to find
 str_true_false/str_false_true replacements



On 2024/9/4 15:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 5:36 AM Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com> wrote:
>> On 2024/8/29 19:24, Hongbo Li wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> I found that there are still a few function rules that are not complete,
>> such as str_on_off, str_enable_disable, str_yes_no. How about adding
>> these rules as well?
> 
> Why not?
> 
Fine. I'll add these rules in v2

Thanks,
Hongbo