| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240911010927.741343-2-lihongbo22@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:18 +0800 From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com> To: <kees@...nel.org>, <andy@...nel.org>, <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>, <nicolas.palix@...g.fr> CC: <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, <cocci@...ia.fr> Subject: [PATCH -next v3 01/10] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_true_false() replacements After str_true_false() has been introduced in the tree, we can add rules for finding places where str_true_false() can be used. A simple test can find over 10 locations. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com> --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index 5e729f187f22..6942ad7c4224 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -85,3 +85,22 @@ e << str_down_up_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_down_up(%s)" % e) + +@..._true_false depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "true" : "false") ++ str_true_false(E) + +@..._true_false_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "true" : "false") + +@...ipt:python depends on report@ +p << str_true_false_r.P; +e << str_true_false_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_true_false(%s)" % e) -- 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists