[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202409170436.C3C6E7F7A@keescook>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 04:43:32 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, gustavoars@...nel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
mcgrof@...nel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] params: Annotate struct module_param_attrs
with __counted_by()
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:45:47AM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The 4294967295 simply means "I don't know." There's probably a bug in
> the size calculation. I'll look into it.
I was able to build a minimized PoC, if that's helpful:
https://godbolt.org/z/qohGd5xh1
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
struct variable {
int a;
int b;
int length;
short array[] __attribute__((counted_by(length)));
};
struct bucket {
int a;
struct variable *growable;
int b;
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct bucket *p;
struct variable *v;
p = malloc(sizeof(*p));
v = malloc(sizeof(*p->growable) + sizeof(*p->growable->array) * 32);
v->length = 32;
printf("%zu\n", __builtin_dynamic_object_size(v->array, 1));
p->growable = v;
printf("%zu\n", __builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->growable->array, 1));
return 0;
}
GCC shows 64 64, but Clang shows 64 0.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists