[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zvu04AYu0zUEvjBs@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 01:37:52 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
song@...nel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com, agk@...hat.com,
snitzer@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, ritesh.list@...il.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, kees@...nel.org, gustavoars@...nel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, quic_srichara@...cinc.com,
quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dm-inlinecrypt: Add inline encryption support
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:04:34PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> What about a block device ioctl, as was previously proposed
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/1658316391-13472-1-git-send-email-israelr@nvidia.com/T/#u)?
No. This is a file system layer policy and needs to sit entirely above
the block layer instead of breaking abstraction boundaries.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists