[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zv1chIuTlOdu-ved@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 17:45:24 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
Cc: kees@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printf: Remove unused 'bprintf'
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 02:31:19PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Andy Shevchenko (andy@...nel.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 02:21:25AM +0100, linux@...blig.org wrote:
> > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
> > >
> > > bprintf is unused. Remove it.
> >
> > bprintf()
>
> OK.
>
> > > It was added in
> > > commit 4370aa4aa753 ("vsprintf: add binary printf")
> > >
> > > but as far as I can see was never used, unlike the other
> > > two functions in that patch.
> >
> > Please, rewrap these lines to use more room on each line.
>
> Something like this? :
> bprintf() is unused. Remove it. It was added in
>
> commit 4370aa4aa753 ("vsprintf: add binary printf")
>
> but as far as I can see was never used, unlike the other two functions in
> that patch.
You have two blank lines in the middle, do you really need them?
I would put it like this
bprintf() is unused. Remove it. It was added in the commit 4370aa4aa753
("vsprintf: add binary printf") but as far as I can see was never used,
unlike the other two functions in that patch.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists