| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20241031103256.9cbb33ec091305805ec64888@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:32:56 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, naveen@...nel.org,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, kees@...nel.org,
gustavoars@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kprobes: Annotate structs with __counted_by()
Hi Nathan,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:55:57 -0700
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:53:32PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> > Add the __counted_by compiler attribute to the flexible array member
> > stripes to improve access bounds-checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and
> > CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index da59c68df841..e6f7b0d3b29c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct kprobe_insn_page {
> > struct kprobe_insn_cache *cache;
> > int nused;
> > int ngarbage;
> > - char slot_used[];
> > + char slot_used[] __counted_by(nused);
> > };
> >
> > #define KPROBE_INSN_PAGE_SIZE(slots) \
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> This change was not properly tested. In next-20241022, where this
> changes appears as commit 0888460c9050 ("kprobes: Annotate structs with
> __counted_by()"), I get a fortify failure because ->nused is initialized
> after the call to memset(). For example, with Debian's powerpc64le
> configuration (which is just the first configuration I happened to see
> this warning in, I don't think it is architecture specific):
>
> $ curl -LSso .config https://github.com/nathanchance/llvm-kernel-testing/raw/096eeab130a9077206d3ddd6f0c6e39187113869/configs/debian/powerpc64le.config
>
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- LLVM=1 olddefconfig zImage.epapr
>
> $ curl -LSs https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/boot-utils/releases/download/20230707-182910/ppc64le-rootfs.cpio.zst | zstd -d >rootfs.cpio
>
> $ qemu-system-ppc64 \
> -display none \
> -nodefaults \
> -device ipmi-bmc-sim,id=bmc0 \
> -device isa-ipmi-bt,bmc=bmc0,irq=10 \
> -machine powernv \
> -kernel arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr \
> -initrd rootfs.cpio \
> -m 2G \
> -serial mon:stdio
> ...
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.12.0-rc4-next-20241022 (nathan@...xlarge-x86) (ClangBuiltLinux clang version 19.1.2 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 7ba7d8e2f7b6445b60679da826210cdde29eaf8b), ClangBuiltLinux LLD 19.1.2 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 7ba7d8e2f7b6445b60679da826210cdde29eaf8b)) #1 SMP Tue Oct 22 20:24:37 UTC 2024
> ...
> [ 0.138628] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.138816] memset: detected buffer overflow: 512 byte write of buffer size 0
> [ 0.140141] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/string_helpers.c:1033 __fortify_report+0x60/0x80
> [ 0.142208] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.142722] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-next-20241022 #1
> [ 0.143379] Hardware name: IBM PowerNV (emulated by qemu) POWER10 0x801200 opal:v7.1 PowerNV
> [ 0.143810] NIP: c000000000900920 LR: c00000000090091c CTR: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.144098] REGS: c000000002acf290 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (6.12.0-rc4-next-20241022)
> [ 0.144457] MSR: 9000000002029033 <SF,HV,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24800280 XER: 00000000
> [ 0.145048] CFAR: c00000000014e414 IRQMASK: 0
> [ 0.145048] GPR00: c00000000090091c c000000002acf530 c0000000017bf0e0 0000000000000041
> [ 0.145048] GPR04: c0000000025911f8 c0000000ffffefff 0000000000000003 0000000000000001
> [ 0.145048] GPR08: 0000000000000003 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 9000000002001033
> [ 0.145048] GPR12: 0000000000800000 c00000000289e000 c000000000010eb8 0000000000000000
> [ 0.145048] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 0.145048] GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000000027fba70
> [ 0.145048] GPR24: 61c8864680b583eb 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 0000000000000000
> [ 0.145048] GPR28: c000000002a83400 c00000000262de68 c00000000262de30 c000000002acf5b0
> [ 0.147696] NIP [c000000000900920] __fortify_report+0x60/0x80
> [ 0.147934] LR [c00000000090091c] __fortify_report+0x5c/0x80
> [ 0.148277] Call Trace:
> [ 0.148465] [c000000002acf530] [c00000000090091c] __fortify_report+0x5c/0x80 (unreliable)
> [ 0.148855] [c000000002acf590] [c000000000900958] __fortify_panic+0x18/0x40
> [ 0.149133] [c000000002acf5b0] [c0000000002e3508] __get_insn_slot+0x308/0x320
> [ 0.149413] [c000000002acf620] [c0000000000586c4] arch_prepare_kprobe+0x1e4/0x270
> [ 0.149699] [c000000002acf6b0] [c0000000002e496c] register_kprobe+0x4cc/0x8e0
> [ 0.149975] [c000000002acf930] [c0000000020154ac] arch_init_kprobes+0x30/0x54
> [ 0.150262] [c000000002acf960] [c0000000020411bc] init_kprobes+0x80/0x120
> [ 0.150524] [c000000002acf9d0] [c000000000010630] do_one_initcall+0x120/0x3e0
> [ 0.150798] [c000000002acfd50] [c000000002005cb8] do_pre_smp_initcalls+0x70/0x114
> [ 0.151082] [c000000002acfd90] [c000000002005b70] kernel_init_freeable+0x14c/0x224
> [ 0.151365] [c000000002acfde0] [c000000000010eec] kernel_init+0x3c/0x250
> [ 0.151622] [c000000002acfe50] [c00000000000de3c] ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
> [ 0.151935] --- interrupt: 0 at 0x0
> [ 0.152433] Code: 3cc2fffc 70630001 3c62ffa0 78841f48 38c6f388 38636489 7c86202a 3cc2ff9c 38c62f30 7cc8305e 4b84d9e1 60000000 <0fe00000> 38210060 e8010010 7c0803a6
> [ 0.153155] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> ...
>
> Even if the current ->nused assignment is moved before the call to
> memset(), the failure still occurs because 1 is clearly wrong for the
> size of memset(), which is 512 bytes for this configuration. Could this
> instance of memset() be avoided by using kzalloc() for the kip
> allocation? Could also take the opportunity to use struct_size(). The
> following diff fixes this issue for me but I did not do any further
> testing. If this does not work for some reason and there is no other
> obvious solution, I think this change should be reverted.
Yeah, it looks good to me. As Jinije said, can you send this as a
fix patch? I will pick it.
Thank you,
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 98d71a5acb72..6adb0cc4e45c 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -95,10 +95,6 @@ struct kprobe_insn_page {
> char slot_used[] __counted_by(nused);
> };
>
> -#define KPROBE_INSN_PAGE_SIZE(slots) \
> - (offsetof(struct kprobe_insn_page, slot_used) + \
> - (sizeof(char) * (slots)))
> -
> static int slots_per_page(struct kprobe_insn_cache *c)
> {
> return PAGE_SIZE/(c->insn_size * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
> @@ -175,7 +171,7 @@ kprobe_opcode_t *__get_insn_slot(struct kprobe_insn_cache *c)
> goto retry;
>
> /* All out of space. Need to allocate a new page. */
> - kip = kmalloc(KPROBE_INSN_PAGE_SIZE(slots_per_page(c)), GFP_KERNEL);
> + kip = kzalloc(struct_size(kip, slot_used, slots_per_page(c)), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!kip)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -185,10 +181,8 @@ kprobe_opcode_t *__get_insn_slot(struct kprobe_insn_cache *c)
> goto out;
> }
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kip->list);
> - memset(kip->slot_used, SLOT_CLEAN, slots_per_page(c));
> - kip->slot_used[0] = SLOT_USED;
> kip->nused = 1;
> - kip->ngarbage = 0;
> + kip->slot_used[0] = SLOT_USED;
> kip->cache = c;
> list_add_rcu(&kip->list, &c->pages);
> slot = kip->insns;
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists