[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241105-tinsmith-countable-fbb51045bc98@spud>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:55:27 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>, linux@...tq-group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add compatible for AM625-based
TQMa62xx SOM family and carrier board
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 11:40:20AM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 18:47 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > > The TQMa62xx is a SoM family with a pluggable connector. The MBa62xx is
> > > the matching reference/starterkit carrier board.
> >
> > Why all the wildcards? Why isn't there a compatible per device in the
> > family?
>
> For the compatible string we've chosen the TQMa6254 as the representative for the TQMa62xx family.
And all the boards in the family are the exact same?
>
> MBa62xx is the proper name of the baseboard; this board can be combined with any TQMa62xx family
> SOM.
Then that one is fine.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists