linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Annotate struct fname with __counted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <173159220757.521904.13348650494002839092.b4-ty@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:53:40 -0500
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Annotate struct fname with __counted_by()

On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 11:18:14 +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Add the __counted_by compiler attribute to the flexible array member
> name to improve access bounds-checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and
> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] ext4: Annotate struct fname with __counted_by()
      commit: de183b2baf90f0acc1854a3998c14b8b228f9643

By the way, in general, you don't need to resend patches unless you
need to rebase them to fix patch conflicts; I track requested patches
using patchwork, and I tend to process and review patches in batches.

If you are concerned that I might have missed a patch, feel free to
reply to the original patch with a ping.  I'll see it in my inbox, and
even if it had gotten lost in my inbox, I can find the original patch
using lore.kernel.org or patchwork.

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>