[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vfp++XMr8VGjjFRBpJi+uAk8PRVPxMLmQciedBzS8gedQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 21:44:55 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: R Sundar <prosunofficial@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] lib/string_choices: Add str_locked_unlocked()/str_unlocked_locked()
helper
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 4:47 PM R Sundar <prosunofficial@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Add str_locked_unlocked()/str_unlocked_locked() helper to return
> "locked" or "unlocked" string literal
Missing period.
...
> --- a/include/linux/string_choices.h
> +++ b/include/linux/string_choices.h
> @@ -82,4 +82,10 @@ static inline const char *str_plural(size_t num)
> return num == 1 ? "" : "s";
> }
>
> +static inline const char *str_locked_unlocked(bool v)
> +{
> + return v ? "locked" : "unlocked";
> +}
> +#define str_unlocked_locked(v) str_locked_unlocked(!(v))
The rest is sorted (okay, read_write() seems to be misplaced, fix that
in a separate change if you wish), please keep it that way (I believe
it should go before on_off).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists