[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1DHp34fyyhtLEV0@yury-ThinkPad>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:20:39 -0800
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>,
"linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"coresight@...ts.linaro.org" <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] compiler.h: add is_const() as a replacement of
__is_constexpr()
> > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> > index a2a56a50dd85227a4fdc62236a2710ca37c5ba52..30ce06df4153cfdc0fad9bc7bffab9097f8b0450 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> > @@ -316,6 +316,47 @@ static inline void *offset_to_ptr(const int *off)
> > #define statically_true(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) && (x))
> > #define statically_false(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) && (x) == 0)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Whether x is the integer constant expression 0 or something else.
> > + *
> > + * Details:
> > + * - The C11 standard defines in §6.3.2.3.3
> > + * (void *)<integer constant expression with the value 0>
> > + * as a null pointer constant (c.f. the NULL macro).
> > + * - If x evaluates to the integer constant expression 0,
> > + * (void *)(x)
> > + * is a null pointer constant. Else, it is a void * expression.
> > + * - In a ternary expression:
> > + * condition ? operand1 : operand2
> > + * if one of the two operands is of type void * and the other one
> > + * some other pointer type, the C11 standard defines in §6.5.15.6
> > + * the resulting type as below:
> > + * if one operand is a null pointer constant, the result has the
> > + * type of the other operand; otherwise [...] the result type is
> > + * a pointer to an appropriately qualified version of void.
> > + * - As such, in
> > + * 0 ? (void *)(x) : (char *)0
> > + * if x is the integer constant expression 0, operand1 is a null
> > + * pointer constant and the resulting type is that of operand2:
> > + * char *. If x is anything else, the type is void *.
> > + * - The (long) cast silences a compiler warning for when x is not 0.
> > + * - Finally, the _Generic() dispatches the resulting type into a
> > + * Boolean.
>
> The comment is absolutely excessive.
I like this comment. Particularly I like the references to the standard
followed by a step-by-step explanation of how the macro is built.
> I'm sure I managed about 2 lines in one of the patches I did.
Sorry, don't understand this.
Thanks,
Yury
> > + *
> > + * Glory to Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>
>
> IIRC Martin has agreed in the past that the accreditation can
> be removed - especially since it refers to the 'sizeof (void)' trick.
>
> > + */
> > +#define __is_const_zero(x) \
> > + _Generic(0 ? (void *)(long)(x) : (char *)0, char *: 1, void *: 0)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Returns a constant expression while determining if its argument is a
> > + * constant expression, most importantly without evaluating the argument.
>
> You need to differentiate between a 'constant integer expression'
> and a 'compile time constant'.
>
> > + *
> > + * If getting a constant expression is not relevant to you, use the more
> > + * powerful __builtin_constant_p() instead.
>
> __builtin_constant_p() is not 'more powerful' it is testing for
> something different.
>
> David
>
> > + */
> > +#define is_const(x) __is_const_zero(0 * (x))
> > +
> > /*
> > * This is needed in functions which generate the stack canary, see
> > * arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c::start_secondary() for an example.
> >
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists