[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1ccXClgTg5Guq6R@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 16:35:40 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>, linux@...tq-group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: ti: Add TQ-Systems TQMa62xx SoM and
MBa62xx carrier board Device Trees
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:42:52PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> I also find a lot of developers don't really understand what phy-mode
> and PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_* actually mean.
... which is why we documented it in Documentation/networking/phy.rst,
but it seems folk who run into RGMII stuff don't read that document.
I'm wondering if we can come up with some kernel-doc compatible way to
document them in linux/phy.h instead, which may stand an improved
chance of being read?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists